Environmental Impact Of The New Power Plant †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Environmental Impact Of The New Power Plant. Answer: New Power Plant: There are various methods by which we can mitigate the impacts of the new power plant. There are various impacts associated with the development of the new power plant like the air pollution due to emission of different air pollutants, noise pollution, congestion in the traffic, water pollution, effects on the historical monuments, safety related issues, waste management and, employment related issues many more (Drbal Westra and Boston 2012). The various ways of mitigating this risks are listed below: The power plant should aim at reducing the different the different air pollutants that causes harm to the environment. These pollutants include SO2, NO2, different particulates and carbon monoxide (CO). the power plant should aim at improving their efficiency on the production so as to reduce the pollutant emissions along with that they should also aim at shifting to the use of the nuclear power plant as there is no emission of sulphur oxide from this type of plants (Phoenix et al. 2012). They can also use fuels with low sulphur content rather than using fossil fuels. Emission of these harmful elements can be avoided by the use of solar energy or pipeline grade gas made from coals. The best way of reducing noise pollution is to contact the manufacturers of the turbine so as to reduce the problem. The manufacturers of the turbine are able to change the turbines operating parameters so as to mitigate the problem. The plant should hire experts capable of evaluating the problems and can suggest certain ways so that a potential solution is obtained (Goto Yogo and Higashii 2013). They can introduce baffles so that changes can take place in the acoustical resonance modes. Stiffening elements can also be added to strategic locations so that the changes take place and the resonant frequency is taken away from the problem frequency. The plant has to look into the matter of dumping their waste water into the river. They have to check that the water coming out from there is plant is not too much hot. Along with that they have to check that there are no harmful pollutants present in the water which can affect the aquatic life and the peoples residing near the plant. They should adopt a proper way of removing the pollutants from the water or any type of liquid that they are dumping into the river (Sueyoshi and Goto 2012). Pre-treatment needs to be done of any type of liquid coming out from the plant. Avoiding the problems with the traffic should be done by the plant. They should limit the number of cars entering and leaving the plant (Drbal Westra and Boston 2012). The plant should consider the making of new parking slots for the cars entering and leaving the plant. Proper timings should be fixed for the cars to enter or leave the plant like allowing the heavy vehicles to enter the plant only at night time or in the early morning so that the busy timings of the day are not affected due to the plants. Sea Defence: Option A or the hard defence can be recommended as the best option. According to the two development solution for the problems faced in a seashore has been compared on the basis of the magnitude and the significance. The actions or factors and the impacts of the costal defence system has been provided below. Identification of Impacts or factors Impact areas Soil erosion The beaches , mudflats or saltmarshes are affected. Loss of site for specific scientific interest as the materials of the project will be coming by roads and Parkston Quay port so it will lead to loss of 1.4HA of the SSSI (Abanades Greaves and Iglesias 2014). Change of character and particle size of the mudflats the plan of pumping the water together with the degraded material will typically carry the finer materials away from the point of deposition and then deposits those around the surrounding (Temmerman et al 2013) leading to the change in the character and the particle size of the mudflats. less attractiveness of the site for birds the attraction of the birds feeding on the invertebrates present on the mudflats decreases with change in character of the mudflats (Perkins et al 2015). Out of rating 10 the ascribed scores are listed below for the identified impacts: Identification of Impacts or factors score according to the impacts out of 10 for soft defence score according to the impacts out of 10 for soft defence Soil erosion 7 7 Loss of site for specific scientific interest 4 6 Change of character and particle size of the mudflats 5 8 less attractiveness of the site for birds 4 8 The plan A or the hard defence can be considered as the best option rather than considering the hard defence. The authority should also look into the betterment of the environmental conditions. The hard defence can be used for the purpose of creating energy and there is also less harm to the environment if implantation of the hard defence takes place. The traffic conditions during the construction of the hard defence is also less (Hsu 2013). The natural habitat of the place is also less affected. This type of defence can be used for the benefit of the society as well by providing additional energy using the tidal energy. According the scores of the impacts the best option is chosen. The total score for the severe impacts are high for the soft defence therefore indicating that the hard defence can be more advantageous and will have less impacts. Mitigation of the impacts should be taken into account after and before the implementation of the project. Necessary mitigation techniques ne ed to be done before the starting of the project as well as after the implementation of the project. Poultry Processing Plant: The environmental conditions which has been briefly discussed over here are: The site proposed for the new poultry farm has been properly described here that is for what purpose the areas around the site are used for, what are the adjoining waterbodies and the cities present around the site. Along with this it also provides with the information if the places around the site are of any ecological, historical, scientific or cultural interest or not. The river present near is the site is of Grade 1B which means it also provides the information that the river is slightly contaminated. The air quality has also been properly discussed over here that means every reason for which the air has attained a good quality is provided over here. The air quality of the new site is expected to be almost similar to that of the existing poultry farm. The environmental conditions which has not been described over here properly are: The meteorological data is not provided properly. Only the presence of airport near the site is produced over here. The other information regarding the meteorology has been provided over here that means the atmospheric chemistry and atmospheric physics of the new site has not been provided (Stull 2012). The weather forecasting of the new site is also not provided over here. The previous weather conditions of the place are also unknown. The traffic: The basic traffic conditions of the roads around the site has not been described. Only the number of cars using the road is provided whereas the daily conditions of the road are not provided. Only a low number of heavy vehicles travel through the roads near the new site. information about the accessibility of the roads by heavy vehicles are also not provided (Abdalla 2016). Only the direction and the speed of the wind are provided over here in the report. All details regarding the traffic and the metrological conditions of the new site. the details regarding the wind conditions of the site needs to be provided in this report. All the traffic conditions like if the road is accessible by heavy vehicles or not and if yes then what is the capacity that the road can bear. Along with this the information is also required if the road can be used in all type of weathers or not (Mueller et al 2015). The information should also be provided about the weather conditions of the site so as to determine if the weather is appropriate for the rising of the animals in the poultry or not. References: Abanades, J., Greaves, D. and Iglesias, G., 2014. Coastal defence through wave farms.Coastal Engineering,91, pp.299-307. Abdalla, A.A.J.A.R., 2016.Bio-security and Associated Risk Factors in Khartoum Poultry farm(Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science and Technology). Drbal, L., Westra, K. and Boston, P. eds., 2012.Power plant engineering. Springer Science Business Media. Goto, K., Yogo, K. and Higashii, T., 2013. A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO 2 capture.Applied Energy,111, pp.710-720. Hsu, S.A., 2013.Coastal meteorology. Elsevier. Mueller, J.P., Rischkowsky, B., Haile, A., Philipsson, J., Mwai, O., Besbes, B., Valle Zrate, A., Tibbo, M., Mirkena, T., Duguma, G. and Slkner, J., 2015. Community?based livestock breeding programmes: essentials and examples.Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics,132(2), pp.155-168. Perkins, M.J., Ng, T.P., Dudgeon, D., Bonebrake, T.C. and Leung, K.M., 2015. Conserving intertidal habitats: What is the potential of ecological engineering to mitigate impacts of coastal structures?.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science,167, pp.504-515. Phoenix, G.K., Emmett, B.A., Britton, A.J., Caporn, S.J., Dise, N.B., Helliwell, R., Jones, L., Leake, J.R., Leith, I.D., Sheppard, L.J. and Sowerby, A., 2012. Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: responses of multiple plant and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long?term field experiments.Global Change Biology,18(4), pp.1197-1215. Stull, R.B., 2012.An introduction to boundary layer meteorology(Vol. 13). Springer Science Business Media Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M., 2012. DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants.Energy Policy,41, pp.422-432. Temmerman, S., Meire, P., Bouma, T.J., Herman, P.M., Ysebaert, T. and De Vriend, H.J., 2013. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change.Nature,504(7478), pp.79-83.