Hamiltonian vs Jeffersonian Democracies - 5550 Words

Federalist and the Democratic Republican parties, respectively. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, advocated the importance of a strong central government in leading the country forward, while the Democratic Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, promoted increasing the common man’s role in government. Although both political parties had good intentions for the future of the United States, the Federalist Party was much more effective at uniting the American people, avoiding domestic faction, and keeping the best interests in mind for the future of the United States. Hamilton said the few, and Jefferson said the many. This is fact that the policies and strategies of Thomas Jefferson served and facilitated a vital equilibrium to†¦show more content†¦Hamilton petitioned President Adams to send John Jay to Paris to negotiate another treaty with France. Adams agreed, but when the ambassadors arrived in France, the French government demanded a bribe of a quarter of a million dollars before it would even talk with the Americans. The demand for the bribe became known as the XYZ Affair, named after the three unnamed French diplomats who had demanded payment. Americans were shocked and many demanded war. Hamilton did not want war at this time, but agreed that the U.S. should begin preparing its military. The Federalist Party sought to destroy the threat of failure by strengthening the United States’ central government. As Alexander Hamilton said, â€Å"A firm Union will be of the utmost moment to the peace and liberty of the states, as a barrier against domestic faction and insurrection.† In Hamilton’s mind, strengthening the central government would ensure freedom for every American citizen by uniting the people to think and speak with a single voice. Hamilton had witnessed firsthand the political and economic confusion caused by states’ conflicting interests and corrupt taxation policies under the Articles of Confederation. He realized that the only way for the Union to survive and prosper was for the Federal government to take control of the country’s political and economic decision-making. With a strong Federal power in place, troublesome interstate conflicts could be solved swiftly and decisively, before theyShow MoreRelatedBook Review: Foundin g Brothers by Joseph Ellis Essay1437 Words   |  6 Pagesdiscusses the unique problems that the revolutionary generation experienced as a result of governing under the new concept of a democracy. These problems included- the interpretation of constitutional powers, the regulation of governmental power through checks and balances, the first presidential elections, the surprising emergence of political parties, states rights vs. federal authority, and the issue of slavery in a otherwise free society. Ellis dives even deeper into the subject by exposing theRead MoreThe War Of 1812 Was Terrible For Americans2959 Words   |  12 Pagesforeclose mortgages on farms, which was considered legal and bank of US was considered financially evil b) Poorer classes were also affected, imprisoned debtors, and there was increase in numbers of prisoners i) This was the beginning of Jeffersonian democracy 11) Growing Pains of the West a) By the year 1819, 9 new states had joined the original 13 states; they were welcomed and were slave state then into a free state i) It was a addition to the old western movement and the less expensive landRead MoreFeds vs Anti-Feds3174 Words   |  13 PagesHamilton Vs. Jefferson December 29, 2006 by Ando hamjeff.jpg I had intended to post Part II of the WWI question last night, but got caught up doing movie reviews on Life of Ando. So to slake your ravenous historical thirst in the meantime, here is my assignment from my history class this past week. If you’re really into American history and how the politics of the early Republic shook out, Jefferson vs. Hamilton is a great study. It’s also a little, I guess comforting, to know that as bad asRead MoreMixed Economy7299 Words   |  30 PagesQuotes in this section indicate content taken from the article in question. * Third Way * Radical center * Centrism * Distributism * Constitutional economics * Political economy * Rule according to higher law * Social Democracy A socialist movement that advocates a mixed economy of private and public ownership combined with a welfare state. * Corporatism Historically, corporatism or corporativism (Italian corporativismo) is a political system in which legislative