Between A Rock And A Hard Case

Between a Rock and a Hard opinion Lt. Dan Meyer had a tough decision to face and would have to resolve about his truety, and that response could result in severe consequences. What he knew about the conditions of his gun, gun enclosure one, and the similar conditions in turrets ii and tercet illustrates that the explosion, a tragedy that could have been avoided, was an accident. His choice in tattle the justness and proving that it was an incident would only lead to the disloyalty of his superior, the pull down of the U.S. Navy, and the disbandment of their battleships.         On the other hand, lying and remaining loyal to his captain and agreeing with the ideals of the Navy, would reason the even as a domestic terrorist moment of a cut up suicide and charge a dead leghorn with lash outable accusations.         If I were Lt. Dan Meyer, I would consider to speak the truth no matter what the penalty. Those forty-seven abide seamen of the U.S.S. Iowa in turret two all died from the neglect of correctly maintained and the privation of updated equipment, untrained men, the test firing experiments that were sedate in the initiatory place, and improperly handled, along with stored powder. To blame this as a murder suicide act of revenge on a navy man who was alleged after his expiration to have been gay to present the Navy look innocent, is dishonor and disloyal to the United States of the States and the people who risk their lives to protect the nation.         By standing up for what you believe in and by doing what is estimable and true, even if it representation horrible consequences, is by far a more loyal act than shame the life of a courageous diddlysquat as a scapegoat, to save the careers of those in the Navy. If you want to follow a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our! page: write my paper